Editing House Rabbit Society and AR prpoganda

From Bun Club Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search

Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 11: Line 11:


=Debunked Items Promoted as Facts =  
=Debunked Items Promoted as Facts =  
80% of what rescue and house rabbit society recommends is WRONG and has no basis in science , its continues to be followed due to stubbornness and does  NOT have the rabbits best interests in mind . Even NOW they are quietly holding back true info even though they KNOW too much salad kills. Pellets AREN'T evil (multiple rabbit nutrition guides, gut biome studies), rolling a rabbit correctly is a safe handling technique (2020,2021),  bonding is  dangerous  in most  situations ( multiple, studies from 1950-2019)  .spay and neuter is extremely high risk post op,  is not effective  for behavior control, or cancer preventing ( current 2020 study) , and the weight charts are Wrong  (you can't lump all breeds together ).
==Water Bottle vs Bowls==
Their is no difference between a bowl or a bottle as long as the rabbit is hydrated and has access to a clean water source at all times.
The debunked M. Clauss study  tried to prove their was a significance difference between bowls and bottles. Since many rabbity's use bottle waterers. the truth in the matter is their is no difference between delivery of water as long as fresh clean water is available bowls, bottles, or gravity systems are all acceptable.
[https://www.proquest.com/openview/aab930d5ae37a871a6db58254da14fdb/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=2041027&fbclid=IwAR231sEmTCZBjH9nE5l6q1mFN-Hb9dXPREmaXCS279ipOCuc4BZDUXeJGtQ Preference of rabbits for drinking from open dishes versus nipple drinkers] Tschudin, A; Clauss, M; Codron, D; Hatt, J-M.The Veterinary Record; London Vol. 168, Iss. 7, (Feb 19, 2011): 190. This study was widely discredited, and removed from ResearchGate, and PubMed , becuse the sample size was 12 dwarf rabbits total. Not large enough sample to gather any conclusive evidence. the Study also failed to take into account evaporation of the water from a open bowl to account for lower volume as compared to a bottle.


==Tonic immobility==  
==Tonic immobility==  


Tonic immobility Aka "Trancing" in rabbits is pretty much stated as fact , but finding any studies that actually prove flipping them over induces that state are hard to come by. it is generally understood as meaning the animal has to be physically incapable of movement, but obviously in real life, rabbits are able to flip themselves back over. that said ,  the study this was taken from was a single study done in the  70's where 12 rabbits were studied  by being put into induced "tonic immobility" ie "trancing". by being SLAMMED  into trays on there backs.  The process of flipping a rabbit onto it's back .. did not cause it to be tranced.. the action of SLAMMING IT VIOLENTLY  into a hard surface and forcibly  restraining it  buy  grabbing it neck  did..  knocking the wind out of it and stunning it.. yet THAT  is the study that  is parroted by HRS.
Tonic immobility in rabbits is pretty much stated as fact , but finding any studies that actually prove flipping them over induces that state are hard to come by. it is generally understood as meaning the animal has to be physically incapable of movement, but obviously in real life, rabbits are able to flip themselves back over. that said ,  the study this was taken from was a single study done in the  70's where 12 rabbits were studied  by being put into induced "tonic immobility" ie "trancing". by being SLAMMED  into metal trays on there backs.  the process of flipping a rabbit onto it's back .. did not cause it to be tranced.. the action of SLAMMING IT VIOLENTLY  into a hard surface did..  knocking the wind out of it and stunning it.. yet THAT  is the study that  is parroted by HRS.
 


updated study:


'''Effect of tonic immobility induction on selected physiological parameters in Oryctolagus cuniculus f. Domesticus rabbits'''
January 2021 Medycyna Weterynaryjna 77(06):295-299
DOI:10.21521/mw.6541


updated study :
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350946951_Effect_of_tonic_immobility_induction_on_selected_physiological_parameters_in_Oryctolagus_cuniculus_f_Domesticus_rabbits
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350946951_Effect_of_tonic_immobility_induction_on_selected_physiological_parameters_in_Oryctolagus_cuniculus_f_Domesticus_rabbits


" Tonic immobility (TI) is a phenomenon known as thanatosis or apparent death. The phenomenon can be induced in many ways. It occurs, for example, in the presence of a hazard, as a result of coercion through an unnatural body position or as a result of administration of certain medicines. TI is sometimes used in veterinary practice to tame patients. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of tonic immobility induction on selected physiological parameters in Oryctolagus cuniculus f. Domesticus rabbits. The study included 20 healthy rabbits, patients of a veterinary clinic, divided into two groups of 10 individuals. In the study group, TI was induced to conduct a standard clinical trial, while the control group were subjected to a standard clinical trial without TI. Heart rate, respiratory rate, pupil diameter and blood glucose concentration were measured in all animals.
" Tonic immobility (TI) is a phenomenon known as thanatosis or apparent death. The phenomenon can be induced in many ways. It occurs, for example, in the presence of a hazard, as a result of coercion through an unnatural body position or as a result of administration of certain medicines. TI is sometimes used in veterinary practice to tame patients. The aim of the study was to determine the effect of tonic immobility induction on selected physiological parameters in Oryctolagus cuniculus f. Domesticus rabbits. The study included 20 healthy rabbits, patients of a veterinary clinic, divided into two groups of 10 individuals. In the study group, TI was induced to conduct a standard clinical trial, while the control group were subjected to a standard clinical trial without TI. Heart rate, respiratory rate, pupil diameter and blood glucose concentration were measured in all animals.
'''''The measurements were performed three times: after the patient’s arrival at the clinic, after a detailed clinical examination in a normal or tonic immobility position and 15 minutes after the end of the examination. Additionally, the blood cortisol concentration was measured twice: on arrival at the clinic and at the end of the clinical trial. The results of the experiment show that miniature rabbits feel less stress during tonic immobility testing than rabbits in the standing position, and therefore this phenomenon should be used for taming animals. ''''' "
'''''The measurements were performed three times: after the patient’s arrival at the clinic, after a detailed clinical examination in a normal or tonic immobility position and 15 minutes after the end of the examination. Additionally, the blood cortisol concentration was measured twice: on arrival at the clinic and at the end of the clinical trial. The results of the experiment show that miniature rabbits feel less stress during tonic immobility testing than rabbits in the standing position, and therefore this phenomenon should be used for taming animals. ''''' "
====Review of the paper  by The Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund May 15 2021 facebook post====
".......The new paper is specifically about rabbits in a veterinary clinic setting. It shows that heart and respiratory rates stay the same or increase in rabbits when they are examined on their fronts, but decrease when they are examined on their backs. Pupil size, another measure of stress, increases when examined on their fronts, but not their backs. Blood glucose remained at a very similar level throughout in both groups. Blood cortisol goes up with handling in both groups, but increases less in those on their backs than their fronts. Rabbits entering a vet clinic are, by definition, already very stressed, so the baseline here is somewhat skewed (this is not a criticism of the paper, just an observation), with heart rates and, in particular, respiratory rates, well above those commonly suggested as "normal".
In summary, during TI in this study:
* Heart and breathing rate drop
* Pupil size decreases
* Glucose does not significantly change
* Cortisol increases (but less than during examination on their fronts)
* There is no suggestion that there is any kind of “natural” pain relief induced by TI.
* These are averages, and some rabbits show very different responses to others.
Conclusions we can draw from this:
* The changes seen during TI are not those of a "fight or flight" response.
* Some rabbits respond with decreases in signs, some with increases, suggesting different individual susceptibilities.
* We cannot say if a rabbit "likes" being turned on its back.
* The decrease in heart and respiratory rate suggest lowered physiological stress but this doesn’t necessarily equal less emotional stress.
And the main concern: there is a difference between lying on their back and “true” TI. Different ways to hold and restrain rabbits have different effects and may induce TI or may not.  In her social media posts on this, Dr Harcourt-Brown mentions this too, drawing a distinction between TI and trancing. The author describes carefully putting rabbits into a position on their backs, which is how Dr Harcourt-Brown also puts it. The exact nature of the difference needs further exploration, with some suggestions previously that where rabbits have had TI used in the past are more susceptible to it in future, and whether there is an element of "learned helplessness" present in at least some cases.
This study was limited to a veterinary clinic setting. As vets, we need to incorporate these results into a contextualised care approach, and consider:
* Why we are doing it, for example to facilitate a life-saving diagnostic or therapeutic procedure like obtaining an x-ray.
* If the position is appropriate. For example, it is a good position to take a urine sample from the bladder but not for syringe feeding because of aspiration risk.
* How are we are lying them on their backs, and that it is in a stable and supported way.
* Whether we are inducing a physiologically relaxed response or inducing a state where the rabbit is tense and poising to jump up and run for its life.
* If it is appropriate for that rabbit. While the rabbits in this study appear to undergo a relaxation response, not all rabbits will do that. If the technique doesn’t work for an individual rabbit, there could be serious consequences if they jump and twist.
* That there is no suggestion that this process has any analgesic benefit at all.
The only conclusions we can draw from this study are limited to a veterinary clinic setting and *our advice for rabbits in all other settings remains the same*. The RWAF aims to give the most up-to-date care advice for rabbits. As they are studied more, there is more evidence, and our advice may therefore change in response.
Richard
Richard Saunders (he/him) BSc (Hons) BVSc FRSB CBiol DZooMed (Mammalian) DipECZM(ZHM) MRCVS
Rabbit Welfare Association and Fund Veterinary Advisor"


==80% Hay==
==80% Hay==
Line 78: Line 28:
This misnomer comes from  the House rabbit society conflating Rabbit and Cavy care.  As well as a  irresponsible disregard for the science of Rabbit nutrition in favor of a feel good approach to making care recommendation without any supporting science.  
This misnomer comes from  the House rabbit society conflating Rabbit and Cavy care.  As well as a  irresponsible disregard for the science of Rabbit nutrition in favor of a feel good approach to making care recommendation without any supporting science.  
Fact is as thoroughly out lined in our feeding section, that  rabbits fed 80% and in particular the  oft parroted Timothy only hay , will not be able to fully meet their daily nutritional needs.
Fact is as thoroughly out lined in our feeding section, that  rabbits fed 80% and in particular the  oft parroted Timothy only hay , will not be able to fully meet their daily nutritional needs.
##### typical house rabbit infographic ### and debunking
First ingredient  should be Alfalfa,  DM protein should be a 16% MINIMUM .  They require a DE 14%protien to maintain body condition. A DM of 16% give a DE of 14% . The graphic artist who made that needs to understand  how to read the research before  posting nonsense .  Just like Fiber should MAX at 22% if the feed is at 17% protein . A good feed should have a fiber content no higher then 5% more the. The DM protein content . Fiber in excess if 25% will starve a rabbit to death. Fat should sit between 2.5% and 3.5% for optimal coat  . Rabbit NEED higher calcium . Lo calcium is actually  detrimental  to bone development and rabbit health .. sludge is not caused by calcium it is caused by poor breeding , rabbit with pinched narrow and malformed hips get sludge because they can not evacuate their urethra .
One of the many reasons that Rabbits and Cavy are fed such different diets is because Rabbits have a different gut bacteria population to guinea pigs, so the mechanism of digestion is different in rabbits, despite similar anatomy
Comparison of the microbial population in rabbits and guinea pigs by next generation sequencing Edward J. Crowley,Jonathan M. King,Toby Wilkinson,Hilary J. Worgan,Kathryn M. Huson,Michael T. Rose,Neil R. McEwan Published: February 9, 2017 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165779
ARBA care guides are written by a panel of DVMs and pellets making up the majority of the diet is their recommendation. Not only that, but a study of the teeth/jaws and digestion of wild rabbits vs domestic rabbits concluded that hay is poor in nutrition, hard to chew which actually causes malocclusion, and causes periodontal disease from hay getting stuck between teeth. Wild rabbits are high nutrition selectors, they only resort to dried hay like grasses in times of starvation/deep winter, just to stay alive.
The digestion of fibre in the rabbit was subjected to several recent reviews (GIDENNE, 1996; GIDENNE et al., 1998d; DE BLAS et al., 1999), as the dietary fibre supply is implicated in the prevention of the digestive disorders (GIDENNE, 1997). However, the favourable effect of fibres with respect to resistance to pathogenic agents was clearly shown only recently (LICOIS and GIDENNE, 1999). In 2000, the same team has also clearly demonstrated the interaction between the initial health status of the animal (SPF vs conventional) and the reaction to low fibre feeds: the higher the initial health status, the lower the digestive disorders frequency (BENNEGADI et al., 2000) On the other hand, a high fibre supply leads to an energy dilution of the diet. The animal thus attempts to increase its feed intake to satisfy energetic needs, and the feed conversion is reduced. When the dietary fibre level is very high (>25% ADF), the animal cannot increase its intake sufficiently to meet its energetic needs, thus leading to a lower growth rate. ~ F. Lebas & T. Gidenne «Recent research advances in rabbit nutrition» page 4
"There is a vast difference in the nutritional value of hay, depending on the type of hay, the quality of forage prior to preparation and the type of and manner of the curing process of hay." Dr. T.E.Reed, Rabbit Specialist
Their are also many arguments against feeding loose hay at all.  Rabbits do best on a balance complete pellet , fed in measured amounts.  Hay can actually  be detrimental  to tooth health causing periodontal  disease,  tooth abcesses, and mechanical  malocclusion  due to the hard nature of cheap stemmy timothy commonly fed .
Hay is also void in nutrients,  feeding an 80% loose  hay diet to a rabbit is actually  starving them slowly , rabbits fed this way tend to be in poor condition , constantly shedding with brittle hair and  dull sickly coats. Too much fiber pushes  what little protein they have too quickly.through the body and they are unable to develop  proper muscle .  It weakens the bones and puts them at higher risk for breaks , it weakens immunity  and makes then more susceptible to disease . It also introduced disease and parasite vectors  , and has brought RHdV and EC i to rabbit households
there is  no  difference in the care we give to pets or breeder or any other rabbits their needs are the same . They are all Domesticated  european wild rabbits .  Hay is not a good food source for rabbits.  .


==Rabbit "salads"==
==Rabbit "salads"==
Excessive  fresh greens, Fruits and Vegetables are detrimental to rabbit health . these items need to be limited to treats , as rabbits digestive systems can not fully and properly digest high sugar fresh materials and these in excess lead to bloat/ GI statis and DEATH.
Excessive  fresh greens, Fruits and Vegetables are detrimental to rabbit health . these items need to be limited to treats , as rabbits digestive system s can not fully and properly digest high sugar fresh materials and these in excess lead to bloat/ GI statis and DEATH.


==Wire Causes Sore Hocks==
==Wire Causes Sore Hocks==
Line 117: Line 43:
Current research shows that rabbits actually prefer to be solidary and  view but not interact with other rabbits the highly territorial nature of rabbits causes a hierarchy where one dominate male rabbit threatens and demands subordination from all other rabbits in the warren. if a subordinate rabbits doesn't do an act of subordination  for the dominate male up to daily. The dominate male violently attacks, because of this rabbits kept in group are always living in fear of other rabbits.
Current research shows that rabbits actually prefer to be solidary and  view but not interact with other rabbits the highly territorial nature of rabbits causes a hierarchy where one dominate male rabbit threatens and demands subordination from all other rabbits in the warren. if a subordinate rabbits doesn't do an act of subordination  for the dominate male up to daily. The dominate male violently attacks, because of this rabbits kept in group are always living in fear of other rabbits.


==Spay and Neuter Changes Behavior==  
==Spay and Neuter changes behavior==  


The only benefit of spay/neuter in rabbits is population reduction. That is easily managed by keeping rabbits separate from each other.


Although Spaying or Neutering removes the risk of ovarian,  uterine, and Testicular Cancers by removing the body part. It can Cause  mammary cancers in Male rabbits by unbalancing the hormones. Male rabbits after a neuter can start producing too much estrogen which can lead to them developing Breast cancers. In female Rabbits it is starting to be researched on the effect of Endocrine and Adrenal diseases  caused by removing the ovaries. Female rabbits often become over aggressive  due to the increase in Testosterones after a spay.  The prevalence of ALL cancer in rabbits  isn't 80% its 14 to 12%.
[[ need link]]


[[need link]]


**notes to be organized  images in  AR propaganda folder on PC .


**notes to be organized  images in  AR propaganda folder on PC .
https://www.raising-rabbits.com/house-rabbit-society.html?fbclid=IwAR1-6paSC265zW-MLRCxkJrpK8Q1kP7-M46pZ47b6PdPVKU8MxAgF3FkZfU
https://rabbitedsociety.webs.com/animalrightsyou.htm?fbclid=IwAR2rkLbAOGTOYfTP88CjTpEpXW3re7rk1rkhNgxhCyMZkIqcPnSHQ5MhRzM
One of the best articles explaining thoroughly how HRS is an ARA extremist group


[https://www.raising-rabbits.com/house-rabbit-society.html a break down of the truth behind the house Rabbit societies ideology]


[https://rabbitedsociety.webs.com/animalrightsyou.htm animal rights and you]  One of the best articles explaining thoroughly how HRS is an ARA extremist group


=HRS, HSUS and PeTA=
=HRS, HSUS and PeTA=
Line 148: Line 73:
" we do this by offering fresh hay a couple of times a day." even in 1996  it's completely contradictory paragraph by paragraph on their own site.
" we do this by offering fresh hay a couple of times a day." even in 1996  it's completely contradictory paragraph by paragraph on their own site.


"A cage should be at least 4 times the size of your bunny-" so . if a new Zealand takes up.. approx. 1 sqft of spaces... a 4 sq foot area is acceptable  that's their own website.
"A cage should be at least 4 times the size of your bunny-" so . if a new Zealand takes up.. approx. 1 sqft of spaces... a 4 sqfoot area is acceptable  that's their own website.


Paige K Parsons  ... an photographer and graphic artist Was education director and web developer from 1997 to 2004 then stepped down.
Paige K Parsons  ... an photographer and graphic artist Was education director and web developer from 1997 to 2004 then stepped down.

Please note that all contributions to Bun Club Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Bun Club Wiki:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)